• imsg on incoming echomail

    From deon@VERT to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 15:20:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: deon to Digital Man on Mon Jan 20 2025 06:53 pm

    Howdy,

    addressed to you (or one of your other BBS users). I'll add some more debug-level log messages to sbbsecho so it's obvious when messages are imported and whom each was addressed to.

    OK, updated.

    OK, got something:

    2025-01-21 15:07:54 Adding PVT_TEST message from Clearing Houz (10:1/1) to packet for 10:999/900: /opt/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/678f1d9a.pkt
    2025-01-21 15:07:54 Added PVT_TEST message from Clearing Houz (10:1/1) to packets for 1 links (exceptions: 1 seen)
    2025-01-21 15:07:54 PVT_TEST: Imported message from Clearing Houz (10:1/1) to deon, subject: Test Reply
    2025-01-21 15:07:54 PVT_TEST: Local message recipient (deon): user #1

    2025-01-21 15:07:54 PVT_TEST: User (deon #1) doesn't have read access to sub-board

    2025-01-21 15:07:54 Deleting /opt/sbbs/fido/inbound/000a2338.pkt (from line 6325)
    2025-01-21 15:07:54 Imported: 1 msgs pvt_test <- PVT_TEST

    So sbbsecho thinks I dont have access to the sub board now - and no, I havent made any changes, havent run scfg/echocfg nor edited any of the config files.

    -rw------- 1 root root 131 Jan 21 10:08 msgs/0001.last.msg
    -rw------- 1 root root 71 Jan 20 21:54 msgs/0001.last.0.msg
    -rw------- 1 root root 71 Jan 20 21:51 msgs/0001.last.1.msg

    -rw-r--r-- 1 deon deon 30395 Jan 20 08:18 ctrl/sbbsecho.ini
    -rw-r--r-- 1 deon deon 11398 Jan 10 14:06 ctrl/sbbs.ini
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 147354 Jan 10 14:06 ctrl/msgs.ini


    ...ëîåï

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI
  • From Digital Man@VERT to deon on Mon Jan 20 20:24:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: deon to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 2025 03:20 pm

    OK, got something:

    2025-01-21 15:07:54 PVT_TEST: User (deon #1) doesn't have read access to sub-board

    Okay, that's a good find. What are the access requirements for the message group that the echo is in and the access and reading requirements for the sub-board (in SCFG)?
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Sling Blade quote #19:
    Doyle: I can't so much as drink a damn glass of water around a midget
    Norco, CA WX: 54.4øF, 13.0% humidity, 1 mph NE wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
  • From deon@VERT to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 16:54:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: Digital Man to deon on Mon Jan 20 2025 08:24 pm

    Howdy,

    Okay, that's a good find. What are the access requirements for the message group that the echo is in and the access and reading requirements for the sub-board (in SCFG)?

    From msgs.ini:

    [grp:0010:PVT]
    description=PrivateNet
    ars=PROT != IMAP AND PROT != IMAPS

    [sub:0010:PVT:TEST]
    description=Test Messages
    ars=
    read_ars=
    post_ars=
    operator_ars=
    moderated_ars=
    area_tag=PVT_TEST


    ...ëîåï

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI
  • From deon@VERT to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 17:00:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: deon to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 2025 04:54 pm

    Howdy,

    Okay, that's a good find. What are the access requirements for the message group that the echo is in and the access and reading requirements for the sub-board (in SCFG)?

    Oh, and its not just that sub:

    2025-01-21 01:04:34 FSX_BBS: User (deon #1) doesn't have read access to sub-board
    2025-01-21 14:24:04 FSX_GEN: User (deon #1) doesn't have read access to sub-board
    2025-01-21 15:07:54 PVT_TEST: User (deon #1) doesn't have read access to sub-board

    What will be common, is the ars for IMAP:
    ars=PROT != IMAP AND PROT != IMAPS

    But that might not be it. I did used to have "ars=PROT NOT IMAP" before (which did nothing at the time).


    ...ëîåï

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI
  • From Digital Man@VERT to deon on Mon Jan 20 23:04:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: deon to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 2025 04:54 pm

    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: Digital Man to deon on Mon Jan 20 2025 08:24 pm

    Howdy,

    Okay, that's a good find. What are the access requirements for the message group that the echo is in and the access and reading requirements for the sub-board (in SCFG)?

    From msgs.ini:

    [grp:0010:PVT]
    description=PrivateNet
    ars=PROT != IMAP AND PROT != IMAPS

    [sub:0010:PVT:TEST]
    description=Test Messages
    ars=
    read_ars=
    post_ars=
    operator_ars=
    moderated_ars=
    area_tag=PVT_TEST

    So at some point you're probably connecting with IMAP[S] which sets your user account protocol to IMAP[S] and then disqualifies your account from reading the "PVT" message group. Removing those access restrictions would resolve the issue. I'll look into making a service option to not change the user protocol (something you could enable for IMAP and IMAPS to prevent this situation).
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Steven Wright quote #19:
    I intend to live forever ... So far, so good.
    Norco, CA WX: 54.3øF, 13.0% humidity, 6 mph NNE wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
  • From Digital Man@VERT to deon on Mon Jan 20 23:04:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: deon to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 2025 05:00 pm

    What will be common, is the ars for IMAP:
    ars=PROT != IMAP AND PROT != IMAPS

    But that might not be it. I did used to have "ars=PROT NOT IMAP" before (which did nothing at the time).

    No, I think that's definitely it.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Rush quote #50:
    I've always been a big sponge. - Neil Peart
    Norco, CA WX: 54.3øF, 13.0% humidity, 6 mph NNE wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
  • From deon@VERT to Digital Man on Tue Jan 21 18:27:00 2025
    Re: imsg on incoming echomail
    By: Digital Man to deon on Mon Jan 20 2025 11:04 pm

    Howdy,

    So at some point you're probably connecting with IMAP[S] which sets your user account protocol to IMAP[S] and then disqualifies your account from reading the "PVT" message group. Removing those access restrictions would resolve the issue. I'll look into making a service option to not change the user protocol (something you could enable for IMAP and IMAPS to prevent this situation).

    So this should be easy to validate. I only have the IMAP connection on my mac mini which I actually dont use as much as my laptop (and so most of the time its asleep).

    I think it must wake up every now and again and get mail, but if I quit mail, then there wont be any IMAP connection to SBBS...

    That should proove if thats it...


    ...ëîåï

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI